Media
ARTICLES & ANALYSIS
Who is watching the World Health Organization?
by Dr Travis Noakes | A major concern is that the WHO’s infodemic research agenda lacks earnest discussion on where health authorities’ own choices and guidelines contribute to ‘misinformation’, ‘disinformation’ and even ‘malinformation’.

The cancer that is public health
by Dr David Bell | When an organ within the body of society becomes as corrupted as self-perpetuating public health has, and proves itself unwilling to reform, society must excise the diseased tissue before it spreads.

Pandemic history, adjusted for financial return
by Dr David Bell | Past authoritarian approaches relied heavily on revising history to lend credence to their claims. In this article, David Bell imagines how that alt-history might sound.

Ten principles of public health that could save society
by Dr David Bell | Public health concerns the public, and the improvement of their health. Yet recently this area of specialisation has been widely attacked for promoting job losses, economic collapse, increased mortality, and the loss of freedoms. There is a way out of this.

Nietzsche’s Last Men and the Covid Event
by Chris Waldburger | Part 1 | The power structures of liberal states depended on a credibility created by the valorizing of neutral, transcendent science. Science had eclipsed religion and superstition, and thus a political order of pragmatic science somehow overcame politics.
MORE ARTICLES
The myths of Pandemic Preparedness
by Dr David Bell | The subversion of health for profit runs contrary to the entire ethos of thepost-World War Two anti-fascist, anti-colonialist movement. When people across politics can acknowledge this reality, they can put aside the false divisions that this corruption has sown
Threats to Freedom of Expression: Covid-19, the ‘fact checking counter-disinformation industry’, and online harm legislation
by Dr Piers Robinson | Freedom of expression is evaporating, evident in censorship during Covid-19, whilst now we see the emergence of online safety/harm legislation that might further curtail freedom of speech. But who has been responsible for the lion’s share of propaganda?
Global Health and the Art of Really Big Lies
by Dr David Bell | The new public health response that was trialed during this outbreak is far more attractive to investors creating vast opportunities for future growth. Holding to the new dogma enables a positive career path and financial security, as did siding with the Inquisition centuries ago.
Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccine Clinical Trial Review
by Shay Zakov | In this work, we review the reports provided by Pfizer to the FDA for the trial’s first interim analysis. The reports demonstrate severe flaws in the procedure of approving Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine based on data from the vaccine’s phase III clinical trial.
Open letter to Facebook for de-platforming and ripping off PANDA
When the foundations of civil societies are being overhauled at speed, and when tried and tested laws and policies are being replaced, people need open spaces for inquiry and debate more than ever. Social media platforms should not only take responsibility for facilitating such fora, but should actively embrace and encourage them.
Good for Business: The Lancet COVID-19 Commission Report
by Dr David Bell | The level of obfuscation of evidence, misrepresentation of prior knowledge, and disregard for diversity of scientific evidence and opinion does not reflect well on either the Lancet or the commission itself.
OLDER ARTICLES
Professor Karim and the Web of Lockdown Contradictions and Untruths | Part 3
Part 3 of 3 | We have witnessed the rise of a new class of ‘experts’, granted extraordinary power to repeal ancient liberties. Most critically, these experts have brooked neither dissent nor debate. Has such strange new authority been a success, and should it be tolerated again?
Professor Karim and the Web of Lockdown Contradictions and Untruths | Part 2
Part 2 of 3 | A multiplicity of scientists independently reaching the same conclusions and recommendations creates the illusion that ‘the experts cannot all be wrong’ when, in fact, these experts are really one conglomerate.
Professor Karim and the Web of Lockdown Contradictions and Untruths | Part 1
Part 1 of 3 | Were scientists like South Africa’s Professor Salim S. Abdool Karim, lauded by media and leaders globally, neutral with regards to political pressures in their approach to the Covid response? Part 1 of this series looks at Karim’s life and work under the religious mantle of science.
PCR testing skewed and corrupted data on SARS-CoV-2 infection and death rates
by Dr Jennifer Smith | Traditionally clinicians do not test for respiratory viruses because testing does not inform patient treatment. In the case of the widespread PCR testing seen during the Covid-19 pandemic, the results should be evaluated in the context of clinical symptoms and possible exposure.
Deafening Silences: propaganda through censorship, smearing and coercion
by Dr Piers Robinson | There is a case to be made that the most important part of any propaganda campaign is the drive to ensure that certain voices, claims and arguments either never see the light of day or otherwise remain contained within “fringe” or “alternative” circles.
The Naked Absurdity of Global Public Health
by Dr David Bell | Something is fundamentally wrong with the mindset of global health professionals, particularly those in positions of leadership. It has become normal to speak, repeat, and defend complete absurdity, as if illusions and fantasies are real. There are no sanctions for operating in this way – indeed it is proving highly successful.
Who’s driving the pandemic express?
by Dr David Bell and Emma McArthur | While the WHO works in the spotlight, the pandemic industry has been growing for over a decade and its expansion accelerates unabated. The WHO is almost a bit-player in a much larger game of public-private partnerships and financial incentives that are driving the pandemic gravy train forward.
Medical Fascism in the Lancet
by Dr David Bell & Domini Gordon | Medical ethics are about protecting society from medical malfeasance and the self-interest of the humans whom we trust to manage health. It is therefore disturbing when prominent people, in a prominent journal, tear up the concept of medical ethics and human rights norms.
Sri Lanka: Lessons from an economic crisis
by Russell Lamberti | A real-world economic and financial disaster is unfolding in Sri Lanka. Like countless crises before, this one is man-made. Lockdowns inflicted direct harm on almost the entire planet, but Sri Lanka is perhaps the first to feel so painfully the inevitable aftershocks of one of history’s greatest follies.
The WHO is using deceit to sell its sponsors’ products
Dr David Bell | Public health relies on trust which is maintained by telling the truth, giving accurate information and sound advice. Advertising relies on manipulating the truth to persuade people to buy a product they may not need. The WHO has adopted this latter course.
Lancet, COVID-19, and the modeling of fallacy
Honesty in medical publishing, meaning publication on the basis of transparent rigorous review and impartiality, is of particular importance to medicine and public health. The outcomes of such publications contribute to saving or killing people.
Who is responsible for inflicting unethical behavioural-science ‘nudges’ on the British people?
by Gary Sidley | Throughout the covid-19 era the world has witnessed an unprecedented campaign of propaganda ostensibly aimed at increasing compliance with lockdowns and other restrictions. To date, there has been a stark reluctance for any stakeholder to accept responsibility for these manipulative and damaging tactics.
Our News In Your Inbox
Subscribe to our newsletter