Kevin McKernan on the review of the Corman-Drosten PCR methodology

09 December 2020

Bretigne Shaffer from What Then Must We Do interviews PANDA’s Kevin McKernan about the report he co-authored calling for the retraction of the Corman-Drosten PCR methodology, which forms the basis of most of the PCR testing worldwide for Covid-19.

What Then Must We Do podcast

The Corman-Drosten Review Report
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR”, by Corman, Drosten, et al

The five other papers that Kevin mentions are:
Jung, et al.
Gand, et al. (Download.)
Etievant, et al.
Muenchhoff, et al.
Konrad, et al.

Kevin on Twitter
PANDA on Twitter
PANDA on YouTube

Publisher’s note: The opinions and findings expressed in articles, reports and interviews on this website are not necessarily the opinions of PANDA, its directors or associates.

Share this

Post Tags

Our News In Your Inbox

Subscribe to our newsletter

MORE ARTICLES, ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH

The myths of Pandemic Preparedness

The myths of Pandemic Preparedness

by Dr David Bell | The subversion of health for profit runs contrary to the entire ethos of thepost-World War Two anti-fascist, anti-colonialist movement. When people across politics can acknowledge this reality, they can put aside the false divisions that this corruption has sown

Global Health and the Art of Really Big Lies

Global Health and the Art of Really Big Lies

by Dr David Bell | The new public health response that was trialed during this outbreak is far more attractive to investors creating vast opportunities for future growth. Holding to the new dogma enables a positive career path and financial security, as did siding with the Inquisition centuries ago.