Kevin McKernan on the review of the Corman-Drosten PCR methodology

09 December 2020

Bretigne Shaffer from What Then Must We Do interviews PANDA’s Kevin McKernan about the report he co-authored calling for the retraction of the Corman-Drosten PCR methodology, which forms the basis of most of the PCR testing worldwide for Covid-19.

What Then Must We Do podcast

The Corman-Drosten Review Report
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR”, by Corman, Drosten, et al

The five other papers that Kevin mentions are:
Jung, et al.
Gand, et al. (Download.)
Etievant, et al.
Muenchhoff, et al.
Konrad, et al.

Kevin on Twitter
PANDA on Twitter
PANDA on YouTube

Publisher’s note: The opinions and findings expressed in articles, reports and interviews on this website are not necessarily the opinions of PANDA, its directors or associates.

Share this

Post Tags

Our News In Your Inbox

Subscribe to our newsletter

MORE ARTICLES, ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH

The Emergence of Neo-Fascism in Public Health

The Emergence of Neo-Fascism in Public Health

by David Bell | The societal changes of the past two years have been defined by, and led by, ‘public health.’ So it is right to look for public health analogies in the past to help understand what is happening, what the drivers are, and where they might lead.

Coronavirus Propaganda: Reflections on an Episode of Mass Self-haunting

Coronavirus Propaganda: Reflections on an Episode of Mass Self-haunting

by Dr Colin Alexander | The selective and strategic overstating of certain issues and understating of others and use of fearmongering rhetoric by governments during the pandemic should be concerning to citizens. It indicates a degree of contempt for the public by officialdom and a disrespect for democratic processes.