Kevin McKernan on the review of the Corman-Drosten PCR methodology

09 December 2020

Bretigne Shaffer from What Then Must We Do interviews PANDA’s Kevin McKernan about the report he co-authored calling for the retraction of the Corman-Drosten PCR methodology, which forms the basis of most of the PCR testing worldwide for Covid-19.

What Then Must We Do podcast

The Corman-Drosten Review Report
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR”, by Corman, Drosten, et al

The five other papers that Kevin mentions are:
Jung, et al.
Gand, et al. (Download.)
Etievant, et al.
Muenchhoff, et al.
Konrad, et al.

Kevin on Twitter
PANDA on Twitter
PANDA on YouTube

Publisher’s note: The opinions and findings expressed in articles, reports and interviews on this website are not necessarily the opinions of PANDA, its directors or associates.

Share this

Post Tags

Our News In Your Inbox

Subscribe to our newsletter

MORE ARTICLES, ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH

Essential Questions to WHO on Pandemic Preparedness and Response

Essential Questions to WHO on Pandemic Preparedness and Response

In line with the founding principles of the WHO and orthodox principles of public health, PANDA has decided to publish its submission for the INB hearings in advance, to encourage open debate in ensuring global pandemic preparedness is underpinned by a strong evidence base, which gives full consideration to the COVID-19 response. 

Here’s Why a WHO-Led Pandemic Treaty is a Terrible Idea

Here’s Why a WHO-Led Pandemic Treaty is a Terrible Idea

by Dr David Thunder | The World Health Organization has proposed that the international community negotiate and eventually ratify an international “accord” or “treaty” that would effectively consolidate the position of the WHO as the pre-eminent public authority responsible for guiding and coordinating international pandemic responses.