PANDA has produced numerous studies containing massive data that show lockdowns are not effective in preventing the spread of the virus. The organization has run into censorship obstacles because it questions, using scientific and actuarial data, the policies of the World Health Organization and governments around the globe.
Iván Iriarte (PANDA): “Contra la pandemia se han tomado medidas que hasta 2020 estaban totalmente desaconsejadas”
Respuesta a la pandemia de Covid-19, tanto la OMS como las instituciones sanitarias de todo el mundo han desechado los protocolos existentes para hacer frente a pandemias y han adoptado medidas.
Nick Hudson on the South African government’s avoidance of data in decision-making throughout the pandemic – Reliable data; an essential component of effective policy formation.
Investigative journalist Sonia Elijah interviews Nick Hudson, who talks about the scandal of using the PCR test to diagnose Covid-19, conflicts of interest, the late Tanzanian president Magufuli, Dr Reiner Fuellmich’s class action lawsuit, Big Tech censorship and much more
To beat COVID hysteria, we must ridicule and laugh.
Ridicule the response.
Laugh at the lunacy.
Reject the fear porn.
The data, facts, and realities of COVID were far away from what the media and public health institutions were presenting to the world at the advent of the pandemic.
And while the controlling narrative was that of lockdowns and fear in response to COVID, organizations like PANDA have been working with some of the top minds in public health, focusing on the hard data and analytics of the pandemic to help save lives.
Discover PANDA Podcasts
Listen to a series of conversations between members of PANDA on iono.fm.
Our News In Your Inbox
Subscribe to our newsletter