Reporting Vaccine Adverse Events
05 November 2021

Examples include the VAERS system (USA), EudraVigilance (EU) and the Yellow Card system (UK). As with severe disease and mortality associated with a recent positive SARS-COV-2 test, vaccine-associated events may result directly from the vaccine (the vaccine is causal) or reflect unrelated background disease that is not related to the vaccine. The voluntary or non-enforced nature of reporting also means that actual rates of reported events may represent only about 10% of the true rate.

These databases serve a vital function in identifying the occurrence of unusual events or higher than expected rates, spurring urgent investigation to ascertain the cause  and, in some circumstances, a halting of or withdrawal of the vaccine. This is critical as mass vaccination moves beyond controlled trials into populations who differ from the clinical trial population, or where rare but critical events are likely to have been missed in the smaller trial group. The rise in reports of adverse events in these three databases since the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, which were introduced after relatively short trial periods, is an example of these systems working, and is intended to trigger urgent action to review safety and potential causality.

Click the flag to go to the reporting site.

United States
South Africa
United Kingdom
Europe
Canada
Germany
New Zealand
Austria
Austria
Switzerland
Switzerland
Australia
South Africa

Publisher’s note: The opinions and findings expressed in articles, reports and interviews on this website are not necessarily the opinions of PANDA, its directors or associates.

Share this

Post Tags

Our News In Your Inbox

Subscribe to our newsletter

RECENTLY ADDED TO THE SITE

Who is watching the World Health Organization?

Who is watching the World Health Organization?

by Dr Travis Noakes | A major concern is that the WHO’s infodemic research agenda lacks earnest discussion on where health authorities’ own choices and guidelines contribute to ‘misinformation’, ‘disinformation’ and even ‘malinformation’.

The cancer that is public health

The cancer that is public health

by Dr David Bell | When an organ within the body of society becomes as corrupted as self-perpetuating public health has, and proves itself unwilling to reform, society must excise the diseased tissue before it spreads.