ARTICLES

Voices | Voices // Government Responsibility
Question Everything

Question Everything

Asking questions is at the heart of science. Science is not an institution and not an authority. Science is never settled. It is forever evolving through conjecture and criticism. Questions form the basis of all scientific inquiry and scientific progress. Without challenging existing concepts – usually held by a majority – there is no new knowledge creation. Censoring dissenting voices eliminates the mechanism of error correction and pushes humanity back into the dark ages. 

COVEXIT: Interview with Nick Hudson

COVEXIT: Interview with Nick Hudson

The interview covers a range of fundamental aspects of the pandemic, including lockdowns; masks; testing; early outpatient treatment and vaccines; the Great Barrington Declaration; information and censorship; trends towards technocratic centralization and responses such as populism to counter them; the live data available at pandata.org and the role of the organization in the future.

Why The Fauci Emails Matter

Why The Fauci Emails Matter

The Fauci emails have revealed the tip of the censorship iceberg and should wake people up to the extent to which we are being kept in the dark. The Press, Academia and public institutions are hiding important information about this crisis from us based on a patriarchal idea that they know what is best for us. Because so many of them have deep-seated conflicts of interest, it is going to be very difficult to win back what we have lost.

Conservative Woman: Why discard the pandemic plan in favour of a senseless lockdown?

Conservative Woman: Why discard the pandemic plan in favour of a senseless lockdown?

The UK has a pandemic plan. It reflects the democratic traditions of the nation, recognising that an informed and empowered public will voluntarily take action to protect themselves, their families and communities during a pandemic. Faced with SARS-CoV-2, the UK, along with most other countries and the World Health Organisation, discarded years of pandemic planning.

Responding to COVID-19: Public Health or Public Harm?

Responding to COVID-19: Public Health or Public Harm?

PANDA’s aim is to offer an evidence-based pathway for policy makers and citizens by returning to long-established public health principles that uphold fundamental human rights. This comprehensive document provides the scientific backing to reopening society.

Pandemic Podcast: Who has been pulling the strings of fear? With Laura Dodsworth

“Fear has, as we know, been the key driver underpinning the relentless Covid-19 response and on the Pandemic Podcast we’ve already taken several deep dives into its devastating — and continuing — impact.
Laura Dodsworth, whose new book A State of Fear paints a chilling picture of the strategies and tactics deliberately used to engineer compliance with the raft of draconian measures flowing from Boris Johnson’s first lockdown announcement in March last year. We will be exploring the roles of the multitude of advisors and the Behavioural Insights Team, also known as ‘the nudge unit’.”

The Conservative Woman: Fearmongering, false narrative and profiteering – The truth about Covid

The Conservative Woman: Fearmongering, false narrative and profiteering – The truth about Covid

In a way not done before, Nick Hudson pulls everything together from changing World Health Organisation recommendations to masks making no difference; from suppression measures shifting the disease burden on to the vulnerable, through to unnecessary vaccine programmes. By following the data and official communications from global organisations, he unravels what transpired to lead us into deleterious lockdowns, which continue to have enormous negative impacts across the world.