Dr Jonathan Engler | The suppression of the concept of natural immunity has all the hallmarks of a coordinated misinformation campaign. It is difficult to tell exactly who the initiators of this were, although it is to be noted that the main beneficiaries have been governments and the vaccine manufacturers.
PANDA requested that the British Society of Immunology amend public messaging as it grossly misrepresents the data available on COVID-19 and immunology in general.
Is there evidence that natural exposure immunity to COVID virus is similar or superior to vaccine-induced immunity, and should we force/mandate these vaccines on our healthy military and police?
This represents the most updated and comprehensive library list of over 70 of the highest-quality, complete, most robust scientific studies and evidence reports/position statements on natural immunity as compared to the COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity and allow you to draw your own conclusion.
Una aguja en cada brazo parece ser la directiva global. Inyectar a los ancianos y a los jóvenes; los enfermos y los sanos; los recuperados y los inmuno-negativos.
Ist es wahr, dass auch Menschen, die eine Covid-Erkrankung überstanden haben, von einer Impfung profitieren? Im Gegenteil! Ein Gastbeitrag von Marc Girardot
La epidemiología , la inmunología y los datos clínicos dicen claramente “¡No!”. No hay ninguna buena razón para vacunar a los recuperados.
Covid-19 brought about an age of misinformation like never before. This article takes a deep dive into the issue of natural immunity and Covid-19 vaccination. It provides evidence of natural immunity and is impeccably researched and well worth reading.
Just like lockdowns, a needle in every arm is another strategy that ignores demographic, geographic and immunological differences is being forced on the entire population without a risk-benefit analysis for the individual or a cost-benefit analysis for society.