by Dr David Bell & Domini Gordon | Medical ethics are about protecting society from medical malfeasance and the self-interest of the humans whom we trust to manage health. It is therefore disturbing when prominent people, in a prominent journal, tear up the concept of medical ethics and human rights norms.
Template letter to businesses requiring proof of vaccination or negative PCR test to access their premises.
For publishing the figures on adverse drug reactions and deaths following injection with a COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ that I discussed in Part 1 of this article, my account was temporarily suspended by Twitter for what it said was ‘spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19.’ In addition to this suspension, my post was removed because, Twitter claimed, it included ‘content that goes directly against guidance from authoritative sources of global and local public health information’.
It’s been nine months now since I analysed the statistics on official ‘COVID-19 deaths’ published by the institutions responsible for justifying the regulations and programmes of the UK biosecurity state. These include the Office for National Statistics, the National Health Service and Public Health England. Together with concerned reports from medical bodies, including Cancer Research UK, the British Heart Foundation and the Alzheimer’s Society, these statistics strongly suggested that at least half the 80,000 deaths attributed to COVID-19 in 2020 resulted from the withdrawal of medical diagnosis, treatment and care under lockdown restrictions. However, this is a conservative estimate, and doesn’t include the 20,000 excess deaths in care homes last year swept under the COVID-19 carpet.
This pro forma letter can be addressed to the Council of a University by a student of that University where the University has adopted, or intends to adopt, a mandatory vaccination plan. The letter can be adapted as a letter from the parent of the student, alternatively, from an attorney representing the student.
On 18 October 2021, the Western Cape Government sent a circular detailing the arrangements surrounding the South African vaccine rollout to 12-17 year olds. This is PANDA’s response.
I write to you to share my deep concerns. As a public health professional, a psychologist and an educator, it is clear to me that children and young people, although practically unaffected by the virus, have been the biggest victims of the response.
A pro forma letter that can be addressed to an employer by an attorney representing an employee whose employer has adopted a mandatory vaccination plan. It can be adapted as a letter from an employee or from a trade union to the employer.
PANDA requested that Discovery Health remove inaccurate information about the Covid-19 vaccines from their FAQ page on the Discovery website. Here is the correspondence between PANDA and Adrian Gore on this matter.
PANDA’s Nick Hudson says that South Africans must not resign from their jobs if they feel threatened about vaccine mandates. Instead, stay calm and don’t be sucked into the fearmongering.